How does this look?
Track enterprise and operational risk in a living register: likelihood × impact scoring, treatment plans with owners and due dates, and a direct line from each risk to the controls that mitigate it.
Most risk registers are a spreadsheet nobody trusts. TATER's is scored, ranked, and wired to the same controls it already scans — so a risk isn't an abstract entry, it's connected to the exact failing control that drives it and the remediation that closes it.
Likelihood × impact scoring with an auto-ranked view, so the register surfaces what needs attention first instead of a flat list.
Link a risk to the controls that mitigate it. When a control fails, you see the risk it exposes — no separate tracker to reconcile by hand.
Accept, mitigate, transfer, or avoid — each with an owner, due date, and justification. Formal, time-bound risk acceptance for documented sign-off.
Every change to a risk — score, status, owner — is logged with attribution, so the register holds up when an auditor asks how you got here.
The register runs the full lifecycle in one place, and pulls directly from the findings TATER already produces.
Log a risk manually, or promote one straight from a failing control or finding so nothing falls through the cracks.
Score likelihood and impact; the register ranks it against everything else on your plate.
Assign an owner and treatment plan, track it to closure, and keep the full audit trail for review.
The quarterly board deck needs “top five risks and what we’re doing about them” — again.
The heat map and top-risks view are already scored on a consistent likelihood × impact scale, with owners and treatment status attached. Export and done.
A failing control is really a business risk the org has decided to live with until Q3.
Raise the risk from the control itself, record a time-bound acceptance with an expiry, and the register — not a forgotten spreadsheet tab — owns the follow-up.
“Show me your risk treatment history for the last twelve months.”
Every risk carries its owner, treatment plan, dates, and linked mitigating controls. The answer is a filtered view, not an archaeology project.
The guide covers scoring scales, linking risks to controls, and configuring your risk-acceptance approval flow.
See scored, control-linked risk management on your own tenant in a live walkthrough.