Manage the whole audit lifecycle in one place — engagements, evidence requests, and workpapers — each tied to the controls under review, so nothing gets re-collected and nothing gets lost between the auditor and the team.
Auditors ask, teams scramble, evidence scatters across email. TATER keeps the engagement, its requests, and its workpapers in one place — pulling from the evidence and controls the platform already tracks — so a request is answered from live data, not reconstructed by hand.
Stand up an audit engagement with its framework, period, and scope, and track it from kickoff to close.
Turn auditor asks into tracked requests, fulfilled from the control evidence TATER already collects.
Keep workpapers attached to the controls under review, with status and attribution as they move through review.
Everything links back to the controls and evidence, so the same fact never gets gathered twice.
The engagement runs the audit end to end, drawing on posture the platform already holds.
Create the engagement, set its framework and period, and define the request list.
Fulfill requests from existing control evidence, or flag what still needs gathering.
Move workpapers through review with full attribution, and close the engagement with the trail intact.
The annual audit lands and with it the usual blizzard of requests, findings, and follow-ups.
One engagement workspace holds the request list, findings, owners, and linked evidence — instead of a shared inbox and three spreadsheets.
They need to see evidence without you emailing attachments for a month.
A time-limited, read-only auditor portal gives them exactly what they need and nothing else — access that expires by itself.
Findings are agreed; now they have to actually get fixed.
Each finding becomes a tracked remediation with an owner and a due date, and the engagement isn’t closed until they are.
The guide covers creating engagements, building request lists, and managing workpapers to close.
See an audit engagement run on live control evidence in a walkthrough.