How does this look?
Log a change, route it through review and approval, and keep the whole decision trail. When an auditor asks how a change got made, the answer is a record — who requested it, who approved it, and why.
Undocumented change is where control breaks down — and where audits fail. TATER captures the request, routes it to reviewers or a change board, records the decision with justification, and keeps it all attached to the affected controls and systems.
Capture what's changing and why, with the affected systems and controls, in a structured record instead of a chat message.
Route changes to reviewers or a change advisory board, with decisions and comments captured on the request.
Every approval or rejection is recorded with a reason and attribution — the evidence auditors want to see.
Changes link to the controls and systems they touch, so change and compliance stay connected.
The workflow keeps changes controlled without slowing the team to a crawl.
Log the change with its scope, risk, and affected systems.
Reviewers or the change board weigh in, with comments captured on the request.
Approve or reject with a documented reason — and keep the trail for audit.
Conditional access broke at 2pm Tuesday. What changed, who approved it, and why?
The change request is linked to the control and the scan that caught the drift — requester, approver, and justification in one record.
Change advisory review shouldn’t mean reading a wall of email threads.
Pending changes queue with impact classification and linked context; low-impact changes auto-approve so the board only sees what needs judgment.
“Walk me through your change history for the identity platform.”
Filter, export, done — approvals, dates, and outcomes attached to every entry.
The guide covers configuring change boards, review routing, and the approval workflow.
See the change workflow run end to end in a walkthrough.